The recent exposure of Shyam Meera Singh’s fabricated claims by the Tamil Nadu Police is yet another reminder of the agenda-driven media and influencer ecosystem that has made a cottage industry out of maligning Hindus and Hindu saints. Singh had shared so-called "evidence" that purportedly linked a Hindu saint to a sexual assault case in Tamil Nadu. His claims created outrage and were picked up by several usual suspects in the digital media echo chamber. But the TN Police, in a press statement, categorically rubbished his claims. There was no login, no digital footprint, no association between the alleged accused and any saint or religious figure. It was pure fiction, designed to inflame, mislead, and provoke.
This isn’t an isolated incident. Time and again, we see the same pattern—an unverified claim goes viral on social media, usually portraying Hindus or Hindu institutions in the worst light possible. Within minutes, influencers, media portals, and so-called "fact-checkers" pick it up and start weaving a narrative. These narratives are rarely paused, questioned, or subjected to due diligence. When the truth finally emerges, it’s too late—the lie has already traveled halfway across the country.
The tragedy here is not just about defamation or misinformation. It is the clear pattern of targeting Hindu beliefs, saints, temples, and practices while maintaining a deafening silence when similar or worse crimes happen within other communities or religious setups. This selective outrage, this asymmetrical activism, is neither journalism nor activism—it’s propaganda. It is aimed at distorting the image of the majority community, manufacturing mistrust in traditional institutions, and creating a civilizational inferiority complex.
The ‘ecosystem’ that is complicit in these acts consists of a cabal of ideologically motivated journalists, YouTubers, social media influencers, and activists—many of whom have been vocal about their disdain for Hinduism and its resurgence under a government they politically oppose. They hide under the garb of free speech, yet their pattern of targeting is anything but neutral. One cannot ignore how their selectivity is often timed with elections, court cases, or socio-political flashpoints—indicating a deeper political motive behind what they portray as humanitarian concern.
It is no coincidence that whenever a Hindu saint, institution, or temple is involved in social service or mass mobilization, an attempt is made to tarnish them through spurious cases, distorted narratives, or planted media stories. Singh’s case is just one more in a long list—remember how fake narratives were spread about the Kashi Vishwanath corridor project "destroying temples", or how fabricated statistics were floated around Sabarimala to justify breaking its ancient traditions? These narratives collapsed under scrutiny—but not before damage was done.
The Tamil Nadu Police’s swift and clear rebuttal in this case is commendable. It demonstrates that even in a state where political undercurrents often sway institutions, truth can still prevail when the law is allowed to function independently. Singh’s tweet now stands as a monument to falsehood—bereft of login records, devoid of any factual basis, and completely disconnected from the reality of the case.
What should worry us, however, is not just the lie—but the speed and scale with which it was accepted by so many. In this digital age, where perception shapes reality, a well-timed lie is more dangerous than a delayed truth. And that is why there must be consequences for such reckless misinformation. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to defame entire communities.
It is high time the Hindu community and its institutions demand accountability from those who repeatedly try to vilify them. This is not about vengeance—it is about justice and equal treatment. The 'ecosystem' may keep trying to manufacture hate, but with vigilant citizens, proactive law enforcement, and a growing culture of fact-checking from the grassroots, every lie will eventually collapse under the weight of its own deception.
Truth doesn’t need amplification—it just needs time. And as this case has once again shown, truth always stands tall.
Uday India Bureau
Leave Your Comment