The Supreme Court on Thursday sought an explanation from the Bihar government over the continued tenure of Panchayati Raj Minister Deepak Prakash, who has remained in office for more than six months in aggregate without being elected to either House of the state legislature. The case raises an important constitutional question regarding the interpretation of Article 164(4) of the Constitution, which permits a non-legislator to serve as a minister for a limited period before securing membership in the legislature.
A Bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant made the observations while hearing a petition challenging Prakash's reappointment as a minister. The petitioner contended that the constitutional six-month exemption cannot be repeatedly invoked through successive appointments, allowing an individual to continue in office without being elected.
Describing the matter as a significant constitutional issue, the Chief Justice observed that the state government would have to explain how a minister could continue in office for more than six months without becoming a legislator. "This is a pure question of law. The State will have to explain how a minister is continuing for over six months without being elected," the Bench remarked. The court posted the matter for further hearing on August 4 and indicated that it was not inclined to entertain unnecessary adjournments given the constitutional importance of the issue.
The petition specifically challenges Deepak Prakash's reappointment under Article 164(4), arguing that the constitutional provision grants only a one-time opportunity for a non-legislator to enter the legislature. According to the petitioner, the provision cannot be used repeatedly by resigning and subsequently rejoining the Council of Ministers without contesting and winning an election.
Prakash was first sworn in as Bihar's Panchayati Raj Minister on November 20, 2025, in the Nitish Kumar-led government despite not being a member of either House of the Bihar Legislature. He continued in office for four months and 26 days until that government demitted office on April 15, 2026.
Following a gap of 22 days, Prakash was inducted once again into the Council of Ministers on May 7, 2026, under the newly formed government headed by Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary, despite still not being elected to the legislature. The petition, filed on May 30, contends that this reappointment effectively extends his tenure beyond the constitutionally permissible period and amounts to "a fraud upon the Constitution."
The petitioner argues that by calculating the aggregate duration of his service across the two governments, Prakash has now exceeded six months in office without becoming a member of the legislature. According to the plea, such successive appointments undermine the constitutional intent behind Article 164(4), which is designed to provide only a temporary window for a minister to secure an electoral mandate.
Article 164(4) of the Constitution provides that a person who is not a member of the state legislature may be appointed as a minister, provided he or she secures election within six months. The provision states: "A Minister who for any period of six consecutive months is not a member of the Legislature of the State shall at the expiration of that period cease to be a Minister."
In practice, ministers appointed under this constitutional exception ordinarily contest a by-election or, where applicable, secure election to the Legislative Council within the stipulated six-month period. The present case, however, raises the broader constitutional question of whether the six-month exemption can effectively be reset through a fresh appointment under a new government without the individual first obtaining legislative membership.
The Supreme Court's eventual ruling is expected to clarify the scope of Article 164(4) and determine whether successive appointments of unelected ministers are constitutionally permissible. The decision could have significant implications for the appointment and continuation of non-legislators in ministerial positions across states, strengthening constitutional conventions governing executive accountability and democratic representation.
Leave Your Comment