The Supreme Court on Tuesday came down heavily on comedian Samay Raina over his conduct in proceedings linked to the India's Got Latent controversy, initially imposing a penalty of Rs 10 lakh before reducing it to Rs 3 lakh. The apex court expressed serious displeasure over what it described as misleading statements and non-compliance with its earlier directions, warning that any further disregard for its orders would invite far more severe consequences.
The matter relates to multiple FIRs registered over allegedly offensive remarks made during episodes of India's Got Latent, a controversy that erupted in January 2025 and drew widespread public criticism. The proceedings also involve YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia, who had earlier faced restrictions on airing his content before being allowed to resume his programmes after assuring the court that he would undertake awareness initiatives involving persons with disabilities.
A bench headed by Chief Justice of India B. R. Gavai observed that Samay Raina had failed to demonstrate respect for the judicial process. The court noted that incorrect statements had been made during the proceedings and found the conduct serious enough to warrant financial penalties.
The Chief Justice remarked that the comedian appeared to have taken the court "for a ride" and criticised the filing of an affidavit that, according to the bench, was not supported by the record. Stressing that such behaviour could not be ignored, the court initially directed Raina to deposit Rs 10 lakh within two weeks, warning that failure to comply would result in strict legal action.
Later in the hearing, after Raina's counsel explained that an affidavit had been filed belatedly, the bench reduced the penalty to Rs 3 lakh. However, the Chief Justice issued a stern warning that if the latest directions were not complied with, the cost would be enhanced to Rs 30 lakh.
During the hearing, advocate Aparajita Singh argued that the respondents had displayed an unwillingness to comply with the Supreme Court's earlier directions. Referring to programmes involving persons with disabilities, she questioned whether the court's intent had genuinely been implemented.
Singh criticised Raina's conduct, telling the bench that inviting a few persons with disabilities to stage shows did not reflect meaningful compliance. She expressed concern that the comedian, regarded by many as a youth icon, had failed to appreciate the seriousness of the court's orders.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta supported the criticism, remarking that India's youth had "better icons." He also referred to the opening act in one of Raina's comedy shows, where a traditional "Nimbu-Mirchi" charm was displayed on stage, suggesting it was aimed at avoiding controversy or legal trouble.
Making strong observations on public responsibility, Chief Justice Gavai said artists occupying public life must learn to respect the sentiments and dignity of others.
"If you don't know how to mend your ways or respect sentiments of the society members then you have to face consequences," the Chief Justice observed.
Justice Surya Kant Bagchi also questioned the manner in which the respondents attempted to demonstrate compliance. Referring to submissions that persons with disabilities had attended the shows, he remarked that the effort appeared to create an impression of "buying them out" rather than genuinely addressing concerns raised before the court.
The Chief Justice further underlined that while freedom of expression remains important, it cannot override the fundamental right to dignity enjoyed by others.
Leave Your Comment