As the Winter Session of Parliament continues to be marked by heated political exchanges, a new and unusual point of conflict emerged on Thursday, centering not on policy, but on propriety. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leveled a serious accusation against an unnamed Trinamool Congress (TMC) Member of Parliament, alleging they were smoking an e-cigarette within the sacred confines of the Lok Sabha premises.
The issue was brought to the fore by BJP MP and former Minister, Anurag Thakur, who addressed the Chair without directly naming the member in question. Thakur highlighted a critical legal contradiction, stating, “This is for the House to know that e-cigarettes are banned in the country. I want to ask the Lok Sabha Speaker whether he has permitted smoking e-cigarettes in the House. A TMC MP has been smoking e-cigarettes for days inside the Lok Sabha.”
His intervention underscored a dual breach: first, of the national ban on electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) imposed in 2019 citing health risks to youth, and second, of the long-standing parliamentary conventions that strictly prohibit smoking anywhere inside the chamber or its adjoining halls.
In response, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla offered a firm and unequivocal reminder of the rules. He affirmed that “there is no rule or precedent that allows any Member of Parliament to smoke inside the House.” While acknowledging the gravity of the allegation, Speaker Birla adopted a procedural stance, adding, “If such an incident is brought to my notice with clarity, appropriate action will follow.” This response places the onus on the accuser to provide concrete evidence before any disciplinary steps can be initiated.
While seemingly a minor issue of rule-breaking, this incident has quickly become a symbolic flashpoint in the ongoing session, characterized by a deeply strained relationship between the treasury and opposition benches. The opposition has consistently accused the government of bypassing parliamentary scrutiny on key legislation, while the treasury benches have charged the opposition with obstructionism.
In this charged environment, the e-cigarette allegation is being viewed through a political lens. For the BJP, it is a pointed question of respect for law and institutional decorum. For the TMC and other opposition parties, it risks being dismissed as a distracting tactic, shifting focus away from substantive debates on the economy, inflation, and security issues slated for the session.
The controversy leaves several questions unresolved. The identity of the accused MP remains officially undisclosed, and no visual evidence has been publicly presented. The TMC has yet to issue an official rebuttal to the specific charge. Furthermore, Speaker Birla’s call for “clarity” sets the stage for whether this remains a verbal allegation or escalates into a formal privilege issue.
Beyond the immediate political sparring, the episode raises pertinent questions about the enforcement of health regulations within Parliament, an institution expected to be the standard-bearer for the laws it creates. The national e-cigarette ban was implemented through an ordinance, making its alleged violation within Parliament’s walls particularly ironic.
As the Winter Session progresses, all eyes will be on whether this allegation fades into the background noise of political wrangling or develops into a more formal test of parliamentary discipline and the consistent application of law. The incident serves as a stark reminder that in the theatre of Indian democracy, the battles over decorum can sometimes be as fiercely contested as those over doctrine.
Leave Your Comment