According to the survey results that the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) just submitted, the FAKE MOSQUE is situated atop a magnificent temple. This discovery is not novel. With a glance at the structure, even a mediocrely intelligent adolescent could declare this. The presence of more than thirty pieces of particular things disproves their claim, despite their best efforts to obliterate statues and carvings of Hindu gods and any other indications of their Hindu identity. The crime scene was too complex for the criminal mullahs to fully "de-Hinduize."
The avaricious mullahs are well aware that in 1669, their "hero," Aurangzeb, destroyed the most revered Jyotirling and desecrated Kashi's devout Vishvanath Temple. He also built an alien edifice in the same location and dubbed it a "mosque." Administrative directives from the Aurangzeb era vividly depict how the demon monarch even prevented the repair of temples that had been demolished. Nevertheless, the Indian mullah mafia is waging a legal struggle to refute the unquestionable historical facts, rather than offering an apology for the horrific crimes committed by their Islamic hero and turning the site over to Temple authorities. It has been blatantly spreading lies, squandering the nation's judiciary's precious time, and inciting friction among communities with the aid of leftist and Congress lobbying. Their hypocrisy is shocking; while they worship at Aurangzeb's grave as though he were a saint, they lack the courage to follow his written instructions to destroy the Temples.
Every mullah is well aware that Muslim invaders and rulers committed horrible crimes against harmless Hindus, as documented by the works of their own Islamic chroniclers during several times of dark Islamic reign. Their favourite divine Islamic act, aside from kidnapping and raping women and forcing them to convert, was destroying temples! They also needed to have read Fatwa-e-Alamgiri, which outlines proper behaviour towards non-Muslims. And yet they're going to argue in court that the Temple was never destroyed? Only morally reprehensible or intellectually dead beings could accomplish such.
These avaricious Indian Muslim clerics also committed a grave offence. Even what they refer to as a mosque is not Islamic! According to their own purportedly sacred medieval literature, no mosque may be built at a location that is under dispute. It makes sense that, in light of such brainless behaviour, the original Arab Muslims despise the "south Asian Muslims," viewing them as lesser converted Muslims. The original Arab Muslims would never treat these converts equally, no matter how much they attempt to emulate Arab/Turkish attire and customs.
Muslim love for Un-Islamic Mosques
Islamic writings make it quite plain that no mosque may be built at a disputed location, but Indian mullahs have shown themselves to be too simple-minded to take this sensible advice to heart. These brainless uneducated Mullahs, motivated by avarice, never feel guilty for defying what they refer to as ISLAM.
The theft and devastation of Hindu temples was a particular focus of previous Islamic invaders. Many went one step further and built something they dubbed a "mosque" out of the rubble of demolished temples. There is one such immoral mosque in Delhi, which the mullahs proudly refer to as Quwwat ul Islam mosque (the "might of Islam" mosque) located near Qutub Minar! The insane Qutbuddin Aibak made it in the year 1200 AD from the rubble of 27 destroyed Hindu and Jain temples!
Qutubuddin was a crazy person who had been Mohammad Ghori's slave commander. He took the kingdom following Ghori's murder in 1206. Over time, the plaster crumbled away to uncover original Hindu carvings and sacred idols, exposing his horrible deed.
By the way, the Qutub Minar, which bears Qutbuddin's name, is not a brand-new, original building. An exceedingly tiny tower-like structure served as the observatory for an ancient Hindu observatory to examine star movements. The looters just stretched it upward to create Qutub Minar, which they then dubbed the "victory tower of Islam"! They failed in their second attempt to build a much larger tower nearby, as evidenced by the remnants of an unfinished building still standing in the Lodhi garden.
For many years, a small but powerful minority of "historians" have attempted to conceal the terrible reality of the strangely named Gyanvapi masjid by downplaying evidence found in Saqi Mustaid Khan's Maasir-i-Alamgiri that Aurangzeb gave the order to have the Vishwanath temple destroyed and the current mosque built. These historians even dismissed the eminent Sir Jadunath Sarkar for drawing attention to Aurangzeb's fanaticism, accusing the Bengali historian of being communal!
If the temple had been completely destroyed, like the one in Ayodhya was, the myth that Gyanvapi was not a collective act of vandalism may still have been upheld. However, it is clear from Aurangzeb's choice to keep a whole wall of the most notable Hindu temple in Kashi when designing a new mosque that would stand on the site of the demolished Hindu house of worship that he intended the Hindu people to suffer for years or even generations to come.
Hatred inbuilt inside Indian Mullahs
Arabs are the true, authentic Muslims. They are the next generation of the same society that existed 1400 years ago, when Muhammad lived and preached. They are allowed to follow Islam without harbouring animosity towards Hindus. Not only do they enthusiastically support the building of Hindu temples on their territory, but they also exhibit a keen interest in Hindu culture. The Ramayana, Mahabharat, and yoga will now be taught in Saudi Arabian classrooms! Prime Minister Modi dedicated a sizable BAPS Temple in Abu Dhabi on February 14, 2024. However, the coerced conversion of second-class mullahs in India makes them fearful of losing their Muslim identity if they associate with Hindus or do not despise them! For them, their hatred of Hindus is the only proof that they are Muslims!
Almost all Muslims who are logical and educated are opposed to the legal battle for Hindu temples. They desire that all Indian Muslims relinquish their conceited claims to significant temples, such as those in Mathura and Kashi, and accept the historical record with dignity and humility. It will be their contribution to the unity of Muslims and Hindus, which cannot be the exclusive domain of Hindus.
In actuality, these reasonable Muslims are True Muslims, just like the Arabs. Their reading of the Quran was limited to moral and ethical principles. They so continue to be linked to their ancient Hindu cultural heritage even if they worship Allah, a newly created, fictitious alien deity. They disapprove of the Muslim invaders' demolition of Hindu temples and do not regard them as representatives of Islam. They have no animosity towards Hindus. The Dawoodi Bohra community exemplifies a religious and peaceful branch of Islam. A class of educated, intelligent, and fiercely patriotic Muslims has formed today; they proudly identify as Sanatani Muslims. They not only fully integrate with Hindus and take part in Hindu holidays, but they also don't have the "Umma" bug.
Legal Battle to Linger On
The Hindu side was just recently permitted by a lower court to do Pooja in the basement of the Gyanvapi mosques in Vyas ji ki Gufa; Mulayam Yadav had forbidden it thirty-one years prior in order to please his Muslim supporters. That is the same Scoundrel who, in Ayodhya, brashly gave the order to open fire on Kar Sevaks, killing scores of them. However, Hindus shouldn't get too excited because, in the event that Muslims make an argument, the higher judiciary can always "Stay" it. And lastly, the SC is always available to keep them entertained, even at strange hours. Also, Manu Singhvi or Kapil Sibal might step in at any point and issue a directive that would be directed towards Hindus.
Regarding the trial, our milords find it difficult to render a verdict against Muslim perpetrators. Even in the absence of a trial, they may easily make lethal statements against Nupur Sharma, but when it comes to Owaisi or Rahmani, they become completely incoherent. The Supreme Court has nearly 60,000 cases pending, but it seems more concerned with the welfare of anti-Hindu Swami Prasad Maurya and aristocratic forgery queen Teesta Setalvad than with ending Temple trials.
Road to Reconciliation
First of all, without truth, reconciliation is impossible. In an attempt to achieve unity, "secular" fictions are written over reality, but finally, the truth finds a way to surface. The secular Left regime has spent decades trying to conceal or distort the truth of Islamic iconoclasm in India. First, they denied that it occurred, then they denied that it had any religious significance, and then they claimed that "everyone did it," including Hindus. There was enough of proof of an earlier temple in Ayodhya, which was eventually confirmed by a court after much deliberation. However, numerous arguments were made to deny and distort this information.
It didn't have to be that way, though, if we begin with the obvious reality. India lost thousands of temples to Islamic invaders. This stems from an iconoclastic theology that is central to the world's two largest monotheistic religions, Islam and Christianity. We witness the deliberate destruction of other people's holy sites all across the world as a result of these theologies. Churches that were constructed after revered native temples were destroyed can be found all over South America. A list of mosques that were constructed atop demolished churches or churches that were transformed into mosques is prominently displayed by the Istanbul museum. Similar to this, all of the mosques were demolished or converted into churches during the Reconquista, when Spain drove out an Islamic occupation. This is the global history of the two monotheistic religions. Their notion that the "other" is bad and that what they worship is "Satanic" is the source of it. It would seem logical to demolish the temples of others if one held such a belief.
Rather of continuing in denial, acknowledging this truth enables us to proceed with more understanding. Indeed, many Indian temples were destroyed by Islamic invaders and rulers. In locations like Goa, Christians also did. This does not imply that modern Muslims or Christians should suffer "punishment" for their violent deeds. Still, honesty and recognition should be the very least that one can hope for. And this has been the issue all along.
The Ram Janmabhoomi controversy should not have persisted for so long. The question of the Kashi Vishwanath Mandir, upon which the Gyanvapi Mosque was erected, shouldn't be resolved either. There is enough of evidence to support this; Aurangzeb's own court documents, which are included in Francois Gautier's recently published book Aurangzeb's Iconoclasm, detail the destruction of the Kashi Vishwanath temple. Hindus have long demanded the restitution of the three most significant sites—Ayodhya, Kashi, and Mathura—out of thousands of others. There isn't much demand for these locations because Hindus value them greatly and Muslims, who would be giving them up for other mosque locations, would barely notice. In India, it would greatly contribute to communal unity if done with grace.
By NILABH KRISHNA
(The content of this article reflects the views of writers and contributors, not necessarily those of the publisher and editor. All disputes are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of competent courts and forums in Delhi/New Delhi only)
Leave Your Comment